I think it’s
interesting that right wing tea party Christians want a Mormon for
president. They definitely believe
Mormonism is a cult and I have heard numerous negative comments about the
religion itself. But hey, it’s a white
man’s religion. That’s right. Most Mormons, up until the late 1970’s were
taught that black people had a curse on them and that’s why their skin is
dark. OMG!!!
People like
rules, people like laws. Laws of the land keep chaos from breaking out, most of
the time anyway. But also, laws can be
distorted and misused to cause oppression.
Look at the punk band in Russia, Pussy Riot. They were given two years in prison for a
thirty minute bout in a church used by politicians that promote Putin, a rather
disliked leader.
Laws, especially in religion, keep people under the illusion that they are
safe.
And sometimes it’s not an
illusion. Sometimes it ‘works’. Yet all things come to an end and the
realization that true freedom, although scary (we seem to be afraid of
ourselves mostly) is taking responsibility for our own actions.
Mormonism is
filled with rules and regulations. There
are so many very clean cut Americans who follow the Mormon belief. From my understanding, all the people who
serve in the Mormon religion are “asked” volunteers. Even the pastors do not get a salary. If a part of the clergy “ask” you to do
something, “you do it.” This is a quote
from a Mormon friend of mine.
It’s also
interesting that the extreme right want freedom in some areas but not
others. Usually it’s about money and
guns.
So, apparently Romney is their
man. I find this interesting because
again, most of the evangelicals that I know consider him to be part of a
cult. Let me clarify “cult”. In Christianity cult was anything or any
belief that oppressed and denied freedom of choice once you are a member of their
church. If you didn’t follow their belief, well…there would be trouble for you in
high places.
That’s all
sideline stuff really. The real issue of
my blog is that I am so disheartened about this country’s political division it
doesn’t leave much hope in me for any sort of social redemption. Maybe we
should go back to just not talking about who we would vote for and making it
sort of a private affair. You know, just
make it between you and the voting booth.
I think there are too many egos involved to do that though. It seems there are too many identities tied
up with political meanderings for this to be possible.
I’m on
facebook, and who isn’t these days. I
see people on there who are ‘devout’ Christians, who talk trash about
politicians so much more than they talk about love of God.
Of course if you disagree with them they
arrogantly dismiss you and consider you a “stray from the fold and going against all the
founding fathers stood for.” What’s with
that? They believe they stand up for“social
justice”, but they pick and choose what they define as social justice based on
scripture; their interpretation of
scripture. When I, or anyone else,
show proof that there are other issues, like poverty, taking care of widows,
single moms etc, they totally find their own definition again. Wow…very frustrating.
Now here's the good news. Our daughter is a Christian and we have these discussions all the time. She tells me that younger christians aren't like that. She tells me younger Christians care about things other than guns, gay marriage and abortion. She tells me the younger generation really do have a different perspective and really do want to stay tuned into the ideals that Jesus truly taught.
I hope so...and hope is keeps a heavy heart going.
No comments:
Post a Comment